I believe any external knowledge we can acquire is entirely limited to human perception; basic answer, I'm aware. What is the truth of the world, if not something that refuses to be found in its absolute form? Or, alterntaively, we aren't wired to find it. Humanity isn't the ultimate life-form of progress & knowledge, after all.

Furthermore, we are a collective; social creatures who shape the perceptions of another, gone rabid through the use of the internet. There are those who consider themselves " deviants " ( e.g flat earthers, conspiracy theorists, etc. ) but my point still stands, that external knowledge is what we make of it & how our social groups influence us to think. Then it comes to question: are we free-thinkers at all?

i dont know what this means i'm confused,..,., so my answer is strawberry!!!!

would be interesting to believe that it's not fully possible to acquire knowledge which i could be a hundred percent sure is real/accurate (for fun because the idea of it would give me a crisis lmao)

what if my knowledge of the external world is just how my mind interprets it, but it may not actually be that way in reality? even if i see other people from the external world confirming that they have the same knowledge i as i do, i like to consider the possibility that my mind may only be perceiving the external world the way it wants to. and so i cannot fully trust the information i have about it.

eeeeh idk if i understood the question right so my answer may be out of place